History is multidimensional . most of the history is written from the point of view of the kings . the layers of the society have multiple perspectives . ruins tell the history from another angle and the creation from its opposite angle . the mix of the culture defines the future to a new dimension.
The core point differs the history and the assimilation point extends a new culture into it.
Look at the Indian perspective. Today it’s a mix of religious culture. Language culture. Political accession culture mix. Every thing is imbibed with clasted with multiplicity.
Pick the language it may be divided into words ,lipi , intonation and most importantly the styles the embellishments , the way of speaking , the way of writing, the style of writing .
Language is never the computerized type it has the feelings the emotions the culture of time. this imbibes the language and coverts into expressions. Language is the most profound way of exchange of our emotions , feelings . it not only converts the feelings but also deliberates the purpose. Icha gyan kriya. Is the components we can separate in a linear fashion. It involves when three combine. Moves into expression.
They say language is a liquid it flows makes ways to comforts and useful purposes.
When ramcharitmanas was created it entirely set a new standard for way of life of the cardinals and masses . it’s a different dimension of history that a person became the persona and changed the history and its various dimensions without being a king , without making an accession.
When budha traveled it changed the history of many countries and made a pathway for coming future . again he was not a king , rather he was a born king but disserted the kingship . in india he is an avatar of the supreme god.
Let me say lets find out the history from the different perspective that is not forced directly or indirectly by the kings.
The history that was prospered
by the strikingly different thoughts.
The history that was created by the human intelligence and not the animal fights.
People accepted it in their lives because of its freshness and the positive changes that made the lives happy and better.
They believed it because it gave a way of life to a different goal as well as life itself.
Samrat ashok left away the life of usual kings and today india still respects him with employing the ashok stambh as the highest symbolic of India that to be purported with towards the world.
Do we need to revisit history in this perspective so that the lives of humankind and in turn of all the creatures have the better life at least a chance to a better life?
Do we learn from the history?
We need to. Actually .
Today we can.
We have the access to the whole world.
We can reach. We can reach without loosing time.
The world today is balanced on a pinhole that is weapon and power of weapon and the might .
Revisiting history may make the changes to make it simple.
There is duplicity in the icha gyan kriya.
People who say its not possible, only believe in the animal might. They do not probably know the power of humanity human mind.
We are different.
We can rise above the animals. We did.
Revisiting history in this perspective may make a change. That the world really needs.
So there is an end to the so called “peace talks” forever.
We pair the footsteps of three different thinkers on the timestamps and also being on the teller of the parallel history. So that we can get the changes that occurred in the same time, but were left without attention.
We reiterate along with the same story that has been told from the viewpoint of the kings and the kingspin.
Lets ask ourselves few questions first of all
Why we are on the brink of pandemics despite the growth of science to the fullest extent and the support that we have been giving to the faith of these science.
Why after the so many decades we could not resolve the hunger problem.
Why there have been so many cults and Cummins despite the relative theory of freedom.
There is a mismatch in the theory and practice as we have been following the route of the present history.
We need a change in the perspective of the history. We learn that the culture route is the better route.
the regime that prosper the present does not create peace it only maintains truce.
Thoughts are nobler than the power itself.
Temples tempt me to the extent of awe in the jaws.
Ramayan was translated and created with vernacular versions on a vast plateau. Ramakina, ramayan,
It will be an interesting subject to find out how the Ramayana spread in all over the asia from centuries.
Thailand , myanmar burma, Indonesia, japan, china, khmer. Etc.
History will be talked in a different perspective. Globally it has been a lot of mass for centuries and the world we see today is not built by those who recite history.
We have made the world compulsorily look from the perspective of power and if we buy a second thought or priority then it will be economics. What we have neglected is that the rest of creature world does not always depend on this. Especially for the human there are examples that without these two there is a multitude of the human race that is not connected to these but they are all victims of these two perils.
If we go into history then after the wars many countries had become completely bankrupt. It was this multitude of human race who constructed the world. But history does not look seriously into it. It creates a hero and then abides by that hero. Let’s say if there would not have been the discovery of atom bomb then there was a serious problem that would have sustained for longer period and then the world would have been entirely different.
But historians have abided by this and did not create the world in a different perspective.
Now today if an impatient country raises the war and breaks the truce the entire world will the same history repeated but in a rather greater skill. There will be a multitude if at all this survives any people, who will again toil for decades to create a peaceful world again.
